Patient safety in America: comparison and analysis of national and Texas patient safety research.

نویسنده

  • J D Dunn
چکیده

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on patient safety in late 1999, To Err is Human, attracted great national attention when it announced that 44,000 to 98,000 patients die each year in American hospitals because of patient safety problems and that a patient safety crisis exists in American health care and American hospitals. The report relied heavily on a Harvard group's study of hospital care in New York in 1984 and another Harvard group's study of hospital care in Utah and Colorado in 1992. This article reviews and compares American hospital inpatient safety research and corresponding Texas hospital patient safety research. It focuses on the major patient safety research of the last two decades that led to the IOM report, and compares information from the major studies with the work of the Texas Medical Foundation (TMF). The Harvard patient safety studies that have received great national attention are compared here with a stronger, broader, and more robust database from TMF, the peer review organization for Texas. The TMF studies of 300,000 patient admissions during 3 years in more than 400 hospitals are compared with the Harvard studies of 30,000 charts in 51 hospitals in New York in 1984 and 15,000 charts in 28 hospitals in Utah and Colorado in 1992. The TMF data and a close look at the Harvard data show a positive patient safety picture that has been ignored too often in the current debate, with low rates of significant injury and death caused by any medical care or hospital care safety or negligence problems.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

COMPARISON OF EVALUATION OF PATIENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT INDICATORS IN SPECIAL SECTIONS HOSPITALS PRIVATE AND EDUCATIONAL AHVAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES IN 2019

Background & Aims: One of the most important issues in the health care system is the observance of patient safety indicators, especially in special sections. In this regard, the evaluation of patient safety assessment in Special care wards as an issue It is always important. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the evaluation of patient safety assessment indicators in the special wa...

متن کامل

Patient Safety Culture: A Meta-analysis of Hospital Data

Background and Objectives: Patient safety (PS) is one of the most important and essential elements of quality in healthcare setting. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the status of patient safety culture using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, data were collected through searching dat...

متن کامل

Using Linear Regression to Identify Critical Demographic Variables Affecting Patient Safety Culture From Viewpoints of Physicians and Nurses

Background: The issues of patient safety and healthcare quality have become increasingly important around the world since the 1990s. Many hospitals manage to reduce the number of adverse events (AEs) that can threaten patient safety in healthcare organizations. Assessing the existing patient safety culture gives hospital management a clear vision of an organization’s strengths ...

متن کامل

Measuring Patient Safety Culture in Iran Using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS): an Exploration of Survey Reliability and Validity

Background and Objectives: Patient Safety Culture is increasingly recognized as an essential driver of patient safety. To establish patient safety culture, firstly the current status of the construct should be assessed. Valid assessment of patient safety culture is contingent on the availability of appropriate measurement tools. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) developed by th...

متن کامل

The Rise of Patient Safety-II: Should We Give Up Hope on Safety-I and Extracting Value From Patient Safety Incidents?; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”

Who could disagree with the seemingly common-sense reasoning that: “We must learn from the things that go wrong.”? Despite major investments to improve patient safety, relatively few evaluations demonstrate convincing reductions in risk, harm, serious error or death. This disappointing trajectory of improvement from learning from errors or Safety-I as it is sometimes known has led some research...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Texas medicine

دوره 96 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000